— بيروت 📱 حمّل التطبيق
اخبار الموقع
الشباب يسحق الأهلي بسداسية تاريخية.. هاتريك كاراسكو وأكبر نتيجة في تاريخ مواجهات الفريقيناكتشاف بترولي جديد في مصر.. بئر «لوركان-6» تضيف 1500 برميل نفط و8 ملايين قدم مكعب من الغاز يومياًفيضانات وسيول تضرب مناطق واسعة في سوريا.. 7 وفيات و4 مفقودين وأضرار جسيمة بالطرق والجسورمصر تشتري 6 شحنات من زيت الوقود وسط ضغوط واردات الطاقة وارتفاع فاتورة الغازوزارة الزراعة تنقذ ضبعاً برياً من مصيدة في عكار.. وتحذّر من استهداف الحيوانات البريةلبنان وقطر يستكملان مباحثات برنامج الطاقة المتكامل.. جولة رابعة في بيروت الأسبوع المقبلرونالدو يشعل الترند بثلاثية نارية أمام الخلود..الاحتلال يفجّر منزلي منفذي عملية فرش الهوى في الخليل.. وتهجير آلاف الفلسطينيين تحت وطأة العدوان
العلوم و التكنولوجيا

Millisecond lifetimes and coherence times in 2D transmon qubits

Millisecond lifetimes and coherence times in 2D transmon qubits

  • Place, A. P. M. et al. New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds. Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K. D. et al. Disentangling losses in tantalum superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041005 (2023).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638, 920–926 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinner, S. et al. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605, 669–674 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, M. et al. Experimental exploration of five-qubit quantum error-correcting code with superconducting qubits. Natl Sci. Rev. 9, nwab011 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivak, V. V. et al. Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even. Nature 616, 50–55 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofek, N. et al. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Nature 536, 441–445 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barends, R. et al. Digital quantum simulation of fermionic models with a superconducting circuit. Nat. Commun. 6, 7654 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandala, A. et al. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature 549, 242–246 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, D., Rabl, P., Rico, E. & Zoller, P. Superconducting circuits for quantum simulation of dynamical gauge fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 110504 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K. et al. Synthesizing five-body interaction in a superconducting quantum circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 190502 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mi, X. et al. Time-crystalline eigenstate order on a quantum processor. Nature 601, 531–536 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollár, A. J., Fitzpatrick, M. & Houck, A. A. Hyperbolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 571, 45–50 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. I. et al. Thermalization and criticality on an analogue-digital quantum simulator. Nature 638, 79–85 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L. B. et al. High-coherence fluxonium qubit. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041041 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, A. et al. Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit. Nature 584, 205–209 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyenis, András et al. Experimental realization of a protected superconducting circuit derived from the 0–π qubit. PRX Quantum 2, 010339 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganjam, S. et al. Surpassing millisecond coherence in on chip superconducting quantum memories by optimizing materials and circuit design. Nat. Commun. 15, 3687 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. et al. Towards practical quantum computers: transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds. npj Quantum Inf. 8, 3 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, D. et al. Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105-qubit Zuchongzhi 3.0 processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 090601 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. T. et al. Environmental radiation impact on lifetimes and quasiparticle tunneling rates of fixed-frequency transmon qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 074002 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H. et al. Titanium nitride film on sapphire substrate with low dielectric loss for superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 024013 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Biznárová, J. et al. Mitigation of interfacial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon superconducting qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 78 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M. et al. Systematic improvements in transmon qubit coherence enabled by niobium surface encapsulation. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 43 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kono, S. et al. Mechanically induced correlated errors on superconducting qubits with relaxation times exceeding 0.4 ms. Nat. Commun. 15, 3950 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuokkola, M. et al. Methods to achieve near-millisecond energy relaxation and dephasing times for a superconducting transmon qubit. Nat. Commun. 16, 5421 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, A. P. et al. Precision measurement of the microwave dielectric loss of sapphire in the quantum regime with parts-per-billion sensitivity. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 034064 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.-H. et al. Acceptor-induced bulk dielectric loss in superconducting circuits on silicon. Phys. Rev. X 14, 041022 (2024).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, D. P. et al. Low-loss α-tantalum coplanar waveguide resonators on silicon wafers: fabrication, characterization and surface modification. Mater. Quantum Technol. 4, 025801 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinis, J. M. & Megrant, A. UCSB final report for the CSQ program: review of decoherence and materials physics for superconducting qubits. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5793 (2014).

  • McRae, C. R. H. et al. Reproducible coherence characterization of superconducting quantum devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 100501 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimov, P. V. et al. Fluctuations of energy-relaxation times in superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090502 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. et al. Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 162601 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlör, S. et al. Correlating decoherence in transmon qubits: low frequency noise by single fluctuators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190502 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cywiński, Ł., Lutchyn, R. M., Nave, C. P. & Das Sarma, S. How to enhance dephasing time in superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. B 77, 174509 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, B. L. et al. Probing spin dynamics on diamond surfaces using a single quantum sensor. PRX Quantum 3, 040328 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Viola, L. & Lloyd, S. Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 58, 2733–2744 (1998).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylander, J. et al. Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. Nat. Phys. 7, 565–570 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, F. et al. The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility. Nat. Commun. 7, 12964 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, F. et al. Distinguishing coherent and thermal photon noise in a circuit quantum electrodynamical system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260504 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertet, P. et al. Dephasing of a superconducting qubit induced by photon noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257002 (2005).

  • Schuster, D. I. et al. ac Stark shift and dephasing of a superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a cavity field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 123602 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, E. et al. Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates. Phys. Rev. A 77, 012307 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. J. & Gambetta, J. M. Quantification and characterization of leakage errors. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032306 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, J. M., Motzoi, F., Merkel, S. T. & Wilhelm, F. K. Analytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 83, 012308 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. M. et al. Optimized driving of superconducting artificial atoms for improved single-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. A 82, 040305 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. et al. Error per single-qubit gate below 10−4 in a superconducting qubit. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 111 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyyppä, E. et al. Reducing leakage of single-qubit gates for superconducting quantum processors using analytical control pulse envelopes. PRX Quantum 5, 030353 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunada, Y. et al. Photon-noise-tolerant dispersive readout of a superconducting qubit using a nonlinear Purcell filter. PRX Quantum 5, 010307 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Liu, Y., Raftery, J. J. & Houck, A. A. Suppression of photon shot noise dephasing in a tunable coupling superconducting qubit. npj Quantum Inf. 3, 1 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. D. et al. Eliminating surface oxides of superconducting circuits with noble metal encapsulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 097001 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, E. et al. Chemical mechanical planarization for Ta-based superconducting quantum devices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 41, 033202 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, J. et al. Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers. Nature 634, 74–79 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, V. et al. Suppression of crosstalk in superconducting qubits using dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024068 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. et al. Coexistence of nonequilibrium density and equilibrium energy distribution of quasiparticles in a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 217001 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, F. et al. Vortex motion induced losses in tantalum resonators. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03168 (2025).

  • McEwen, M. et al. Resolving catastrophic error bursts from cosmic rays in large arrays of superconducting qubits. Nat. Phys. 18, 107–111 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, P. M. et al. Synchronous detection of cosmic rays and correlated errors in superconducting qubit arrays. Nat. Commun. 16, 6428 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Z. H., Li, P. Y. & Meng, X. K. Nanoindentation creep behaviors of amorphous, tetragonal, and bcc Ta films. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 516, 253–258 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanazzi, L. et al. The QICK (Quantum Instrumentation Control Kit): readout and control for qubits and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 044709 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 


  • ■ مصدر الخبر الأصلي

    نشر لأول مرة على: www.nature.com

    تاريخ النشر: 2025-11-05 02:00:00

    الكاتب: Matthew P. Bland

    تنويه من موقع “yalebnan.org”:

    تم جلب هذا المحتوى بشكل آلي من المصدر:
    www.nature.com
    بتاريخ: 2025-11-05 02:00:00.
    الآراء والمعلومات الواردة في هذا المقال لا تعبر بالضرورة عن رأي موقع “yalebnan.org”، والمسؤولية الكاملة تقع على عاتق المصدر الأصلي.

    ملاحظة: قد يتم استخدام الترجمة الآلية في بعض الأحيان لتوفير هذا المحتوى.

    yalebnan.org — متابعة الخبر