Evolution, taste, processing, shifts, dietary, preference
Scott, K. Gustatory processing in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 63, 15–30 (2018).
Google Scholar
Auer, T. O., Shahandeh, M. P. & Benton, R. Drosophila sechellia: a genetic model for behavioral evolution and neuroecology. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 527–554 (2021).
Munch, D., Goldschmidt, D. & Ribeiro, C. The neuronal logic of how internal states control food choice. Nature 607, 747–755 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yarmolinsky, D. A., Zuker, C. S. & Ryba, N. J. Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects. Cell 139, 234–244 (2009).
Google Scholar
Policarpo, M., Baldwin, M. W., Casane, D. & Salzburger, W. Diversity and evolution of the vertebrate chemoreceptor gene repertoire. Nat. Commun. 15, 1421 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, R. et al. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 463, 311–317 (2010).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Pseudogenization of a sweet-receptor gene accounts for cats’ indifference toward sugar. PLoS Genet. 1, 27–35 (2005).
Google Scholar
Toda, Y. et al. Early origin of sweet perception in the songbird radiation. Science 373, 226–231 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, G. et al. Identification and expression profiles of gustatory receptor genes in Bactrocera minax larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae): role of BminGR59f in larval growth. Insect Sci. 29, 1240–1250 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Identification of a gustatory receptor tuned to sinigrin in the cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009527 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fujii, S. et al. Drosophila sugar receptors in sweet taste perception, olfaction, and internal nutrient sensing. Curr. Biol. 25, 621–627 (2015).
Google Scholar
Weiss, L. A., Dahanukar, A., Kwon, J. Y., Banerjee, D. & Carlson, J. R. The molecular and cellular basis of bitter taste in Drosophila. Neuron 69, 258–272 (2011).
Google Scholar
Harris, D. T., Kallman, B. R., Mullaney, B. C. & Scott, K. Representations of taste modality in the Drosophila brain. Neuron 86, 1449–1460 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Dhaliwal, R., Stanley, M., Junca, P. & Gordon, M. D. Functional imaging and connectome analyses reveal organizing principles of taste circuits in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 35, 2391–2405 (2025).
Walker, S. R., Pena-Garcia, M. & Devineni, A. V. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits in Drosophila. Sci. Rep. 15, 5278 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tastekin, I. et al. From sensory detection to motor action: the comprehensive Drosophila taste-feeding connectome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.25.671814 (2025).
Shiu, P. K., Sterne, G. R., Engert, S., Dickson, B. J. & Scott, K. Taste quality and hunger interactions in a feeding sensorimotor circuit. eLife 11, e79887 (2022).
Google Scholar
Snell, N. J. et al. Complex representation of taste quality by second-order gustatory neurons in Drosophila. Curr Biol 32, 3758–3772 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cavey, M. et al. Increased sugar valuation contributes to the evolutionary shift in egg-laying behavior of the fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002432 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pelaez, J. N. et al. Taste evolution in an herbivorous drosophilid. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.582299 (2024).
Wang, W. et al. Sugar sensation and mechanosensation in the egg-laying preference shift of Drosophila suzukii. eLife 11, e81703 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dweck, H. K., Talross, G. J., Wang, W. & Carlson, J. R. Evolutionary shifts in taste coding in the fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. eLife 10, e81703 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dweck, H. K. M. & Carlson, J. R. Molecular logic and evolution of bitter taste in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 30, 17–30 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dey, M., Brown, E., Charlu, S., Keene, A. & Dahanukar, A. Evolution of fatty acid taste in drosophilids. Cell Rep. 42, 113297 (2023).
Google Scholar
McBride, C. S. Rapid evolution of smell and taste receptor genes during host specialization in Drosophila sechellia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4996–5001 (2007).
Google Scholar
Matsuo, T., Sugaya, S., Yasukawa, J., Aigaki, T. & Fuyama, Y. Odorant-binding proteins OBP57d and OBP57e affect taste perception and host-plant preference in Drosophila sechellia. PLoS Biol. 5, 985–996 (2007).
Google Scholar
Reisenman, C. E., Wong, J., Vedagarbha, N., Livelo, C. & Scott, K. Taste adaptations associated with host specialization in the specialist Drosophila sechellia. J. Exp. Biol. 226, jeb244641 (2023).
Google Scholar
Auer, T. O. et al. Olfactory receptor and circuit evolution promote host specialization. Nature 579, 402–408 (2020).
Google Scholar
Charlu, S., Wisotsky, Z., Medina, A. & Dahanukar, A. Acid sensing by sweet and bitter taste neurons in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Commun. 4, 2042 (2013).
Google Scholar
Itskov, P. M. et al. Automated monitoring and quantitative analysis of feeding behaviour in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 5, 4560 (2014).
Google Scholar
Alvarez-Ocana, R. et al. Odor-regulated oviposition behavior in an ecological specialist. Nat. Commun. 14, 3041 (2023).
Google Scholar
Task, D. et al. Chemoreceptor co-expression in Drosophila melanogaster olfactory neurons. eLife 11, e72599 (2022).
Google Scholar
Watanabe, K. et al. Interspecies comparative analyses reveal distinct carbohydrate-responsive systems among Drosophila species. Cell Rep. 28, 2594–2607 (2019).
Google Scholar
Abe, M. et al. Shortened lifespan induced by a high-glucose diet is associated with intestinal immune dysfunction in Drosophila sechellia. J. Exp. Biol. 225, jeb244423 (2022).
Google Scholar
Melvin, R. G. et al. Natural variation in sugar tolerance associates with changes in signaling and mitochondrial ribosome biogenesis. eLife 7, e40841 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. V. et al. Overlap and divergence of neural circuits mediating distinct behavioral responses to sugar. Cell Rep. 43, 114782 (2024).
Google Scholar
Steck, K. et al. Internal amino acid state modulates yeast taste neurons to support protein homeostasis in Drosophila. eLife 7, e31625 (2018).
Google Scholar
LeDue, E. E., Chen, Y. C., Jung, A. Y., Dahanukar, A. & Gordon, M. D. Pharyngeal sense organs drive robust sugar consumption in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 6, 6667 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. D., Park, S. J., Joseph, R. M., Ja, W. W. & Dahanukar, A. A. Combinatorial pharyngeal taste coding for feeding avoidance in adult Drosophila. Cell Rep. 29, 961–973 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guillemin, J. et al. Taste cells expressing Ionotropic Receptor 94e reciprocally impact feeding and egg laying in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 43, 114625 (2024).
Google Scholar
Takagi, S. et al. Olfactory sensory neuron population expansions influence projection neuron adaptation and enhance odour tracking. Nat. Commun. 15, 7041 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Alcaniz, J. A. et al. An expression atlas of variant ionotropic glutamate receptors identifies a molecular basis of carbonation sensing. Nat. Commun. 9, 4252 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lima, D. B. M., Dos Santos, A. L., Cardoso, C. A. L., Krause, L. C. & Caramao, E. B. Studies related to the chemical composition, biological activities and toxicity of methanolic extracts of noni (Morinda citrifolia) fruits and leaves. Nat. Prod. Res. 36, 5868–5871 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tauber, J. M. et al. A subset of sweet-sensing neurons identified by IR56d are necessary and sufficient for fatty acid taste. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007059 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ikeda, R., Wada, M., Nishigaki, T. & Nakashima, K. Quantification of coumarin derivatives in noni (Morinda citrifolia) and their contribution of quenching effect on reactive oxygen species. Food Chem. 113, 1169–1172 (2009).
Ahn, J. E., Chen, Y. & Amrein, H. Molecular basis of fatty acid taste in Drosophila. eLife 6, e30115 (2017).
Google Scholar
Devineni, A. V., Deere, J. U., Sun, B. & Axel, R. Individual bitter-sensing neurons in Drosophila exhibit both ON and OFF responses that influence synaptic plasticity. Curr. Biol. 31, 5533–5546 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gardiner, A., Barker, D., Butlin, R. K., Jordan, W. C. & Ritchie, M. G. Evolution of a complex locus: exon gain, loss and divergence at the Gr39a locus in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 3, e1513 (2008).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ma, D. et al. Structural basis for sugar perception by Drosophila gustatory receptors. Science 383, eadj2609 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shiu, P. K. et al. A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing. Nature 634, 210–219 (2024).
Google Scholar
McKellar, C. E., Siwanowicz, I., Dickson, B. J. & Simpson, J. H. Controlling motor neurons of every muscle for fly proboscis reaching. eLife 9, e54978 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gonzalez Segarra, A. J., Pontes, G., Jourjine, N., Del Toro, A. & Scott, K. Hunger- and thirst-sensing neurons modulate a neuroendocrine network to coordinate sugar and water ingestion. eLife 12, RP88143 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schlegel, P. et al. Information flow, cell types and stereotypy in a full olfactory connectome. eLife 10, e66018 (2021).
Google Scholar
Prieto-Godino, L. L., Schmidt, H. R. & Benton, R. Molecular reconstruction of recurrent evolutionary switching in olfactory receptor specificity. eLife 10, e69732 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chu, B., Chui, V., Mann, K. & Gordon, M. D. Presynaptic gain control drives sweet and bitter taste integration in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 24, 1978–1984 (2014).
Google Scholar
Inagaki, H. K., Panse, K. M. & Anderson, D. J. Independent, reciprocal neuromodulatory control of sweet and bitter taste sensitivity during starvation in Drosophila. Neuron 84, 806–820 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cui, X., Meiselman, M. R., Thornton, S. N. & Yapici, N. A gut-brain-gut interoceptive circuit loop gates sugar ingestion in Drosophila. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.02.610892 (2024).
Carvalho-Santos, Z. et al. Cellular metabolic reprogramming controls sugar appetite in Drosophila. Nat. Metab. 2, 958–973 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ling, F., Dahanukar, A., Weiss, L. A., Kwon, J. Y. & Carlson, J. R. The molecular and cellular basis of taste coding in the legs of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 34, 7148–7164 (2014).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Fly Cell Atlas: a single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 375, eabk2432 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gohl, D. M. et al. A versatile in vivo system for directed dissection of gene expression patterns. Nat. Methods 8, 231–237 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arnoult, L. et al. Emergence and diversification of fly pigmentation through evolution of a gene regulatory module. Science 339, 1423–1426 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gratz, S. J. et al. Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in. Drosophila. Genetics 196, 961–971 (2014).
Google Scholar
Port, F., Chen, H.-M., Lee, T. & Bullock, S. L. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2967–E2976 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F. & Basler, K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3312–3317 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Alcaniz, J. A., Zappia, G., Marion-Poll, F. & Benton, R. A mechanosensory receptor required for food texture detection in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 8, 14192 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cachero, S., Ostrovsky, A. D., Yu, J. Y., Dickson, B. J. & Jefferis, G. S. Sexual dimorphism in the fly brain. Curr. Biol. 20, 1589–1601 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ribeiro, C. & Dickson, B. J. Sex peptide receptor and neuronal TOR/S6K signaling modulate nutrient balancing in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 20, 1000–1005 (2010).
Google Scholar
Yushkevich, P. A. et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31, 1116–1128 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
Google Scholar
■ مصدر الخبر الأصلي
نشر لأول مرة على: www.nature.com
تاريخ النشر: 2025-11-26 02:00:00
الكاتب: Enrico Bertolini
تنويه من موقع “yalebnan.org”:
تم جلب هذا المحتوى بشكل آلي من المصدر:
www.nature.com
بتاريخ: 2025-11-26 02:00:00.
الآراء والمعلومات الواردة في هذا المقال لا تعبر بالضرورة عن رأي موقع “yalebnan.org”، والمسؤولية الكاملة تقع على عاتق المصدر الأصلي.
ملاحظة: قد يتم استخدام الترجمة الآلية في بعض الأحيان لتوفير هذا المحتوى.
