Small persistent humid forest clearings drive tropical forest biomass losses
Pan, Y. et al. The enduring world forest carbon sink. Nature 631, 563–569 (2024).
Google Scholar
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Feng, Y. et al. Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century. Nat. Sustain. 5, 444–451 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aragão, L. E. O. C. & Shimabukuro, Y. E. The incidence of fire in Amazonian forests with implications for REDD. Science 328, 1275–1278 (2010).
Google Scholar
Asner, G. P. et al. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 310, 480–482 (2005).
Google Scholar
Silva Junior, C. H. et al. Persistent collapse of biomass in Amazonian forest edges following deforestation leads to unaccounted carbon losses. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8360 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, L. et al. Comparable biophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks on warming from tropical moist forest degradation. Nat. Geosci. 16, 244–249 (2023).
Google Scholar
Poorter, L. et al. Multidimensional tropical forest recovery. Science 374, 1370–1376 (2021).
Google Scholar
Long, T. et al. 30 m resolution global annual burned area mapping based on Landsat images and Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 11, 489 (2019).
Vancutsem, C. et al. Long-term (1990–2019) monitoring of forest cover changes in the humid tropics. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1603 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bourgoin, C. et al. Human degradation of tropical moist forests is greater than previously estimated. Nature 631, 570–576 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., Souza, C. Jr. & Olofsson, P. Satellite-based estimates reveal widespread forest degradation in the Amazon. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2956–2969 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pugh, T. A. M. et al. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4382–4387 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
Google Scholar
Heinrich, V. H. A. et al. Large carbon sink potential of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon to mitigate climate change. Nat. Commun. 12, 1785 (2021).
Google Scholar
Moreno-Mateos, D. et al. Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt. Nat. Commun. 8, 14163 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gao, X. et al. The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics. Nat. Commun. 16, 6092 (2025).
Google Scholar
Robinson, N. et al. Protect young secondary forests for optimum carbon removal. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 793–800 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lapola, D. M. et al. The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 379, eabp8622 (2023).
Google Scholar
Muller-Landau, H. C. et al. Patterns and mechanisms of spatial variation in tropical forest productivity, woody residence time, and biomass. New Phytol. 229, 3065–3087 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chazdon, R. L. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6, 51–71 (2003).
Google Scholar
Cushman, K. C. et al. Impact of a tropical forest blowdown on aboveground carbon balance. Sci. Rep. 11, 11279 (2021).
Google Scholar
Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211–214 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chen, N. et al. Revealing the spatial variation in biomass uptake rates of Brazil’s secondary forests. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 208, 233–244 (2024).
Google Scholar
Heinrich, V. H. A. et al. The carbon sink of secondary and degraded humid tropical forests. Nature 615, 436–442 (2023).
Google Scholar
Holcomb, A., Mathis, S. V., Coomes, D. A. & Keshav, S. Computational tools for assessing forest recovery with GEDI shots and forest change maps. Sci. Remote Sens. 8, 100106 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Google Scholar
Csillik, O. et al. A large net carbon loss attributed to anthropogenic and natural disturbances in the Amazon arc of deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2310157121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Feng, Y. et al. Global patterns and drivers of tropical aboveground carbon changes. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 1064–1070 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).
Google Scholar
Qie, L. et al. Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects. Nat. Commun. 8, 1966 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wulder, M. A. et al. The global Landsat archive: status, consolidation, and direction. Remote Sens. Environ. 185, 271–283 (2016).
Google Scholar
Masolele, R. N. et al. Mapping the diversity of land uses following deforestation across Africa. Sci. Rep. 14, 1681 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. et al. Central African biomass carbon losses and gains during 2010–2019. One Earth 7, 506–519 (2024).
Google Scholar
Song, X.-P., Huang, C., Saatchi, S. S., Hansen, M. C. & Townshend, J. R. Annual carbon emissions from deforestation in the Amazon Basin between 2000 and 2010. PLoS ONE 10, e0126754 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y. et al. Recent expansion of oil palm plantations into carbon-rich forests. Nat. Sustain. 5, 574–577 (2022).
Google Scholar
Espírito-Santo, F. D. B. et al. Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3434 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cochrane, M. A. & Laurance, W. F. Synergisms among fire, land use, and climate change in the Amazon. AMBIO 37, 522–527 (2008).
Google Scholar
Silvestrini, R. A. et al. Simulating fire regimes in the Amazon in response to climate change and deforestation. Ecol. Appl. 21, 1573–1590 (2011).
Google Scholar
Saito, M. et al. Fire regimes and variability in aboveground woody biomass in miombo woodland. J. Geophys. Rese. Biogeosci. 119, 1014–1029 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hansis, E., Davis, S. J. & Pongratz, J. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1230–1246 (2015).
Google Scholar
Houghton, R. & Nassikas, A. A. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 456–472 (2017).
Google Scholar
Grassi, G. et al. Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO2 sinks. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 914–920 (2018).
Google Scholar
Achard, F. et al. Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2540–2554 (2014).
Google Scholar
Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pearson, T. R. H., Brown, S., Murray, L. & Sidman, G. Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical forest degradation: an underestimated source. Carbon Balance Manag. 12, 3 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xu, L. et al. Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021).
Google Scholar
Khairoun, A., Mouillot, F., Chen, W., Ciais, P. & Chuvieco, E. Coarse-resolution burned area datasets severely underestimate fire-related forest loss. Sci. Total Environ. 920, 170599 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dalagnol, R. et al. Mapping tropical forest degradation with deep learning and Planet NICFI data. Remote Sens. Environ. 298, 113798 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dupuis, C., Fayolle, A., Bastin, J.-F., Latte, N. & Lejeune, P. Monitoring selective logging intensities in central Africa with Sentinel-1: a canopy disturbance experiment. Remote Sens. Environ. 298, 113828 (2023).
Google Scholar
Slagter, B. et al. Monitoring direct drivers of small-scale tropical forest disturbance in near real-time with Sentinel-1 and -2 data. Remote Sens. Environ. 295, 113655 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alencar, A. A. C. et al. Long-term Landsat-based monthly burned area dataset for the Brazilian biomes using deep learning. Remote Sens. 14, 2510 (2022).
Google Scholar
Santoro, M. et al. Design and performance of the Climate Change Initiative Biomass global retrieval algorithm. Sci. Remote Sens. 10, 100169 (2024).
Google Scholar
Enright, N. J., Fontaine, J. B., Bowman, D. M., Bradstock, R. A. & Williams, R. J. Interval squeeze: altered fire regimes and demographic responses interact to threaten woody species persistence as climate changes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 265–272 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bennett, A. C. et al. Sensitivity of South American tropical forests to an extreme climate anomaly. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 967–974 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. et al. Small scale agriculture continues to drive deforestation and degradation in fragmented forests in the Congo Basin (2015–2020). Land Use Policy 134, 106922 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V. & Potapov, P. V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8650 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ferro, P. D. et al. Regional-scale assessment of burn scar mapping in southwestern Amazonia using burned area products and CBERS/WFI data cubes. Fire 7, 67 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pessôa, A. C. M. et al. Intercomparison of burned area products and its implication for carbon emission estimations in the Amazon. Remote Sens. 12, 3864 (2020).
Google Scholar
van Wees, D. et al. Global biomass burning fuel consumption and emissions at 500 m spatial resolution based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED). Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 8411–8437 (2022).
Google Scholar
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).
Google Scholar
Santoro, M. & Cartus, O. ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (Biomass_cci): global datasets of forest above-ground biomass for the years 2010, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, v4. NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis https://doi.org/10.5285/af60720c1e404a9e9d2c145d2b2ead4e (2023).
Petersson, H. et al. Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass—a comparative study. For. Ecol. Manag. 270, 78–84 (2012).
Google Scholar
Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600821 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hartung, M., Carreño-Rocabado, G., Peña-Claros, M. & van der Sande, M. T. Tropical dry forest resilience to fire depends on fire frequency and climate. Front. For. Glob. Change 4, 755104 (2021).
Nguyen, T. V. et al. Human-driven fire regime change in the seasonal tropical forests of central Vietnam. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL100687 (2023).
Google Scholar
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Post-disturbance canopy recovery and the resilience of Europe’s forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 25–36 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fawcett, D. et al. Declining Amazon biomass due to deforestation and subsequent degradation losses exceeding gains. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1106–1118 (2023).
Google Scholar
Giardina, C. P. Advancing our understanding of woody debris in tropical forests. Ecosystems 22, 1173–1175 (2019).
Google Scholar
Harmon, M. E. et al. Release of coarse woody detritus-related carbon: a synthesis across forest biomes. Carbon Balance Manag. 15, 1 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zanne, A. E. et al. Termite sensitivity to temperature affects global wood decay rates. Science 377, 1440–1444 (2022).
Google Scholar
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B. & Cole, C. V. Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochemistry 5, 109–131 (1988).
Google Scholar
Ometto, J. P. et al. A biomass map of the Brazilian Amazon from multisource remote sensing. Sci. Data 10, 668 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rodda, S. R. et al. LiDAR-based reference aboveground biomass maps for tropical forests of South Asia and Central Africa. Sci. Data 11, 334 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y. Small persistent clearings in humid forests drive tropical forest biomass carbon losses. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15869647 (2025).
■ مصدر الخبر الأصلي
نشر لأول مرة على: www.nature.com
تاريخ النشر: 2026-01-07 02:00:00
الكاتب: Yidi Xu
تنويه من موقع “yalebnan.org”:
تم جلب هذا المحتوى بشكل آلي من المصدر:
www.nature.com
بتاريخ: 2026-01-07 02:00:00.
الآراء والمعلومات الواردة في هذا المقال لا تعبر بالضرورة عن رأي موقع “yalebnan.org”، والمسؤولية الكاملة تقع على عاتق المصدر الأصلي.
ملاحظة: قد يتم استخدام الترجمة الآلية في بعض الأحيان لتوفير هذا المحتوى.
