Small persistent humid forest clearings drive tropical forest biomass losses
Pan, Y. et al. The enduring world forest carbon sink. Nature 631, 563–569 (2024).
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).
Feng, Y. et al. Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century. Nat. Sustain. 5, 444–451 (2022).
Aragão, L. E. O. C. & Shimabukuro, Y. E. The incidence of fire in Amazonian forests with implications for REDD. Science 328, 1275–1278 (2010).
Asner, G. P. et al. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 310, 480–482 (2005).
Silva Junior, C. H. et al. Persistent collapse of biomass in Amazonian forest edges following deforestation leads to unaccounted carbon losses. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8360 (2020).
Zhu, L. et al. Comparable biophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks on warming from tropical moist forest degradation. Nat. Geosci. 16, 244–249 (2023).
Poorter, L. et al. Multidimensional tropical forest recovery. Science 374, 1370–1376 (2021).
Long, T. et al. 30 m resolution global annual burned area mapping based on Landsat images and Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 11, 489 (2019).
Vancutsem, C. et al. Long-term (1990–2019) monitoring of forest cover changes in the humid tropics. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1603 (2021).
Bourgoin, C. et al. Human degradation of tropical moist forests is greater than previously estimated. Nature 631, 570–576 (2024).
Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., Souza, C. Jr. & Olofsson, P. Satellite-based estimates reveal widespread forest degradation in the Amazon. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2956–2969 (2020).
Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017).
Pugh, T. A. M. et al. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4382–4387 (2019).
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
Heinrich, V. H. A. et al. Large carbon sink potential of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon to mitigate climate change. Nat. Commun. 12, 1785 (2021).
no-Mateos, D. et al. Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt. Nat. Commun. 8, 14163 (2017).
Gao, X. et al. The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics. Nat. Commun. 16, 6092 (2025).
Robinson, N. et al. Protect young secondary forests for optimum carbon removal. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 793–800 (2025).
Lapola, D. M. et al. The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 379, eabp8622 (2023).
Muller-Landau, H. C. et al. Patterns and mechanisms of spatial variation in tropical forest productivity, woody residence time, and biomass. New Phytol. 229, 3065–3087 (2021).
Chazdon, R. L. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6, 51–71 (2003).
Cushman, K. C. et al. Impact of a tropical forest blowdown on aboveground carbon balance. Sci. Rep. 11, 11279 (2021).
Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211–214 (2016).
Chen, N. et al. Revealing the spatial variation in biomass uptake rates of Brazil’s secondary forests. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 208, 233–244 (2024).
Heinrich, V. H. A. et al. The carbon sink of secondary and degraded humid tropical forests. Nature 615, 436–442 (2023).
Holcomb, A., Mathis, S. V., Coomes, D. A. & Keshav, S. Computational tools for assessing forest recovery with GEDI shots and forest change maps. Sci. Remote Sens. 8, 100106 (2023).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Csillik, O. et al. A large net carbon loss attributed to anthropogenic and natural disturbances in the Amazon arc of deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2310157121 (2024).
Feng, Y. et al. Global patterns and drivers of tropical aboveground carbon changes. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 1064–1070 (2024).
Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).
Qie, L. et al. Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects. Nat. Commun. 8, 1966 (2017).
Wulder, M. A. et al. The global Landsat archive: status, consolidation, and direction. Remote Sens. Environ. 185, 271–283 (2016).
Masolele, R. N. et al. Mapping the diversity of land uses following deforestation across Africa. Sci. Rep. 14, 1681 (2024).
Zhao, Z. et al. Central African biomass carbon losses and gains during 2010–2019. One Earth 7, 506–519 (2024).
Song, X.-P., Huang, C., Saatchi, S. S., Hansen, M. C. & Townshend, J. R. Annual carbon emissions from deforestation in the Amazon Basin between 2000 and 2010. PLoS ONE 10, e0126754 (2015).
Xu, Y. et al. Recent expansion of oil palm plantations into carbon-rich forests. Nat. Sustain. 5, 574–577 (2022).
Espírito-Santo, F. D. B. et al. Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3434 (2014).
Cochrane, M. A. & Laurance, W. F. Synergisms among fire, land use, and climate change in the Amazon. AMBIO 37, 522–527 (2008).
Silvestrini, R. A. et al. Simulating fire regimes in the Amazon in response to climate change and deforestation. Ecol. Appl. 21, 1573–1590 (2011).
Saito, M. et al. Fire regimes and variability in aboveground woody biomass in miombo woodland. J. Geophys. Rese. Biogeosci. 119, 1014–1029 (2014).
Hansis, E., Davis, S. J. & Pongratz, J. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1230–1246 (2015).
Houghton, R. & Nassikas, A. A. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 456–472 (2017).
Grassi, G. et al. Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO2 sinks. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 914–920 (2018).
Achard, F. et al. Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2540–2554 (2014).
Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).
Pearson, T. R. H., Brown, S., Murray, L. & Sidman, G. Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical forest degradation: an underestimated source. Carbon Balance Manag. 12, 3 (2017).
Xu, L. et al. Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021).
Khairoun, A., Mouillot, F., Chen, W., Ciais, P. & Chuvieco, E. Coarse-resolution burned area datasets severely underestimate fire-related forest loss. Sci. Total Environ. 920, 170599 (2024).
Dalagnol, R. et al. Mapping tropical forest degradation with deep learning and Planet NICFI data. Remote Sens. Environ. 298, 113798 (2023).
Dupuis, C., Fayolle, A., Bastin, J.-F., Latte, N. & Lejeune, P. Monitoring selective logging intensities in central Africa with Sentinel-1: a canopy disturbance experiment. Remote Sens. Environ. 298, 113828 (2023).
Slagter, B. et al. Monitoring direct drivers of small-scale tropical forest disturbance in near real-time with Sentinel-1 and -2 data. Remote Sens. Environ. 295, 113655 (2023).
Alencar, A. A. C. et al. Long-term Landsat-based monthly burned area dataset for the Brazilian biomes using deep learning. Remote Sens. 14, 2510 (2022).
Santoro, M. et al. Design and performance of the Climate Change Initiative Biomass global retrieval algorithm. Sci. Remote Sens. 10, 100169 (2024).
Enright, N. J., Fontaine, J. B., Bowman, D. M., Bradstock, R. A. & Williams, R. J. Interval squeeze: altered fire regimes and demographic responses interact to threaten woody species persistence as climate changes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 265–272 (2015).
Bennett, A. C. et al. Sensitivity of South American tropical forests to an extreme climate anomaly. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 967–974 (2023).
Shapiro, A. et al. Small scale agriculture continues to drive deforestation and degradation in fragmented forests in the Congo Basin (2015–2020). Land Use Policy 134, 106922 (2023).
Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V. & Potapov, P. V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8650 (2010).
Ferro, P. D. et al. Regional-scale assessment of burn scar mapping in southwestern Amazonia using burned area products and CBERS/WFI data cubes. Fire 7, 67 (2024).
Pessôa, A. C. M. et al. Intercomparison of burned area products and its implication for carbon emission estimations in the Amazon. Remote Sens. 12, 3864 (2020).
van Wees, D. et al. Global biomass burning fuel consumption and emissions at 500 m spatial resolution based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED). Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 8411–8437 (2022).
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).
Santoro, M. & Cartus, O. ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (Biomass_cci): global datasets of forest above-ground biomass for the years 2010, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, v4. NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis https://doi.org/10.5285/af60720c1e404a9e9d2c145d2b2ead4e (2023).
Petersson, H. et al. Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass—a comparative study. For. Ecol. Manag. 270, 78–84 (2012).
Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600821 (2017).
Hartung, M., Carreño-Rocabado, G., Peña-Claros, M. & van der Sande, M. T. Tropical dry forest resilience to fire depends on fire frequency and climate. Front. For. Glob. Change 4, 755104 (2021).
Nguyen, T. V. et al. Human-driven fire regime change in the seasonal tropical forests of central Vietnam. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL100687 (2023).
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Post-disturbance canopy recovery and the resilience of Europe’s forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 25–36 (2022).
Fawcett, D. et al. Declining Amazon biomass due to deforestation and subsequent degradation losses exceeding gains. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1106–1118 (2023).
Giardina, C. P. Advancing our understanding of woody debris in tropical forests. Ecosystems 22, 1173–1175 (2019).
Harmon, M. E. et al. Release of coarse woody detritus-related carbon: a synthesis across forest biomes. Carbon Balance Manag. 15, 1 (2020).
Zanne, A. E. et al. Termite sensitivity to temperature affects global wood decay rates. Science 377, 1440–1444 (2022).
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B. & Cole, C. V. Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochemistry 5, 109–131 (1988).
Ometto, J. P. et al. A biomass map of the Brazilian Amazon from multisource remote sensing. Sci. Data 10, 668 (2023).
Rodda, S. R. et al. LiDAR-based reference aboveground biomass maps for tropical forests of South Asia and Central Africa. Sci. Data 11, 334 (2024).
Xu, Y. Small persistent clearings in humid forests drive tropical forest biomass carbon losses. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15869647 (2025).
نشر لأول مرة على: www.nature.com
تاريخ النشر: 2026-01-07 02:00:00
الكاتب: Yidi Xu
تنويه من موقع “yalebnan.org”:
تم جلب هذا المحتوى بشكل آلي من المصدر:
www.nature.com
بتاريخ: 2026-01-07 02:00:00.
الآراء والمعلومات الواردة في هذا المقال لا تعبر بالضرورة عن رأي موقع “yalebnan.org”، والمسؤولية الكاملة تقع على عاتق المصدر الأصلي.
ملاحظة: قد يتم استخدام الترجمة الآلية في بعض الأحيان لتوفير هذا المحتوى.
